[Author][Course Code][Instructor][Date]Kant vs . Hume : On Knowledge and CausalityThe Prolegomena has ii related purposes : 1 ) to assert the integrity of metaphysics as a science , and 2 ) to theme a new simulacrum of knowledge construction . Kant seemed to be concerned more of the front purpose . In the compute to the book , he saidNo occurrence has occurred that could have been more definitive for the fate of this science than the assault made upon it by David Hume . Hume proceeded in the first place from a single exactly important construct of metaphysics to wit , that of the connecter of cause and tack together (Kant , xviiIn the first chapter of the book , Kant returned to Hume s customary conundrum : causality . Kant proposed `to apply a trial with Hume s elusive concept , namely the concept of cause (Kant , 66 . Kant argued that it is possible to have a perfect(a) solution to the Humean problem as it relates to knowledge construction .
Kant saidThe Humean problem rescues the a priori origin of the shrill concepts of the sagacity and the validity of the oecumenical laws of nature as laws of the correspondence , in such a mien that their use is reverberate only to ascertain , because their theory has its ground merely in the relation of the understanding to experience , however , not in such a way that they are derived from experience , yet that experience is derived from them , a totally reversed kind of company which never occurred to Hume (Kant , 66 ) - italics mine...If you indigence to get a undecomposed essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.