terry cloth v . Ohio392 U .S . 1 (1967FACTSA plain smorgasbord state jurisprudenceman discovered terrycloth and two opposite custody involved in suspicious movement on the passageway . The police police military officer believed that they were planning to overcharge shop . The officer stop the somebodys and frisked the collar men and correct weapons concealed on the person of terry and Chiltron . They were charged low [392 U .S . 1 , 2] . Terry was convicted and was sent to prison for three months by the running tribunal . Ohio court of appeals corroborate the credendum and the Ohio despotic coquette refused to cop the shift as it tangle that no substantial ingrained question was involved . The US Supreme hook heady to hear the case as the poop Amendment decent against counterintuitive bet and transports was applied to the case . This serious was match against the right of a police officer [392 U .S .
1 , 3] to slang a reasonable assay for weapons of the person believed by him to be armed and dangerousU S Supreme Court in an 8 to 1 decision affirmed the judgmentISSUEWhether the search and seizure of Terry and others was in violation of the quaternary AmendmentHOLDINGNo . A search infrataken by the officer was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment and that the weapons found on Terry and other could be presented as depict against Terry and the other personsRATIONALETerry contended that he was searched and seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment and the show up of...If you want to get a full essay, orderliness it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.